The Terra Luna crypto crash ranks among the most devastating collapses in cryptocurrency history. The market lost a staggering $45 billion in just one week during May 2022. LUNA’s value dropped from its peak of $119.51 to almost nothing. Its companion stablecoin UST, which held the position of third-largest by market cap, plunged to mere 10 cents.
The impact rippled through the entire crypto market. Investors lost over $400 billion as the broader crypto ecosystem felt the shock. The Terra Luna story shows how quickly the crypto world can turn upside down. This piece dives into the Terra collapse to break down the key events. We’ll explore why it happens and the significant lessons that every investor needs to learn from this defining moment in cryptocurrency history.
The Rise of Terra and LUNA
Do Kwon and Daniel Shin started the Terra blockchain project in January 2018 in South Korea. They had a bold vision to build a new financial system without the limits of traditional banking36. Terra stood out from other crypto projects that focused on speculation. The team wanted to create practical solutions for everyday payments and finance, starting with e-commerce in Asia.
How Terra aimed to revolutionize DeFi
Terra built an open-source blockchain that hosted various decentralized applications (dApps) powered by state-of-the-art technologies like Mantlemint and Terrain36. The project took a complete approach to decentralized finance (DeFi). The team created an entire financial system that brought payments, investments, and savings products together in one ecosystem.
Stablecoins were at the heart of Terra’s innovation as the key to widespread crypto adoption. The project wanted to fulfill Bitcoin’s original purpose: a true peer-to-peer electronic cash system37. This was different from Bitcoin’s rise into mainly a store of value rather than a way to exchange money.
Terra’s technical setup gave it several edges over other blockchains. The system used a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS) consensus mechanism called “Tendermint” that made speed and efficiency a priority37. The platform also connected smoothly with other blockchains through the Cosmos SDK, including Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, and Harmony37.
Developers loved building financial applications on Terra because of its high transaction speed, low fees (0.5% to 2%), and competitive performance38. The network gained ground through payment systems like Chai in Korea and Memepay in Mongolia39.
Terra’s influence grew so much that the Washington Nationals baseball team signed a five-year, $40 million sponsorship deal with Terra’s decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) in February 202237. The ecosystem expanded faster by early 2022 with native dApps covering DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 applications.
The role of UST and LUNA in the ecosystem
Two main tokens powered the Terra ecosystem: TerraUSD (UST) and LUNA. UST worked as an algorithmic stablecoin tied to the US dollar for exchanges, while LUNA served as the network’s governance and utility token40.
UST was different from traditional stablecoins like USDC or USDT that use dollar reserves. It used a clever algorithmic system called “burn and mint equilibrium”21. Users could always trade 1 UST for $1 worth of LUNA whatever the market conditions37.
The system stayed stable through a careful balance between both tokens. Traders could profit when UST’s price went above $1 by buying $1 worth of LUNA, burning it to create one UST, and selling that UST for more than $1 – bringing the price back down25. When UST dropped below its peg, traders bought it at a discount and redeemed it for $1 worth of LUNA, which reduced UST supply and restored the peg25.
This algorithmic approach created an interesting relationship between the tokens. LUNA would be burned as more people wanted UST, which reduced its supply and pushed up its price. The Columbus-5 network upgrade in 2021 made this effect stronger by burning LUNA permanently instead of sending it to a community pool39.
The market loved this model. LUNA’s price shot up from just $0.66 in early 2021 to an amazing $116 by April 202237. UST grew even more impressively, with its market value jumping from $180 million at the start of 2021 to almost $15 billion by March 2022. This made it the third-largest stablecoin after USDT and USDC37.
LUNA did more than just keep prices stable in the ecosystem. Network validators staked LUNA to secure transactions and earned rewards from fees and new tokens at a fixed 7% yearly inflation rate36. LUNA holders could also vote on development proposals to govern the protocol41.
The project saw explosive growth and brought many innovations. However, people still questioned whether Terra’s economic model could last – concerns that proved right during the catastrophic collapse in May 2022.
The Algorithm Behind the Stablecoin
Terra’s innovative design centered on an algorithmic balancing act that determined UST and LUNA’s relationship. UST was different from traditional stablecoins backed by cash reserves. It managed to keep price stability through a complex mechanism that altered how cryptocurrencies could work as everyday currency.
How the mint-and-burn mechanism worked
UST’s price stability depended on a system called “burn and mint equilibrium” that created a symbiotic relationship between UST and LUNA21. Users could always exchange 1 UST for $1 worth of LUNA, whatever the market conditions were42.
The process worked through two primary arbitrage scenarios:
- When UST traded above $1: Traders could profit by burning $1 worth of LUNA to mint 1 UST, then selling that UST at the higher market price. This action increased UST supply and brought its price back down to $142.
- When UST fell below $1: Traders could buy cheap UST and redeem it for $1 worth of LUNA. This reduced UST supply and pushed its price upward42.
Here’s a simple example: When UST traded at $0.95, traders could buy it at that discount and exchange it for $1 worth of LUNA. This gave them a 5% profit and reduced UST supply43. So, this ongoing arbitrage activity aimed to keep UST’s dollar peg through market incentives instead of actual dollar reserves.
Terra’s protocol called this “decentralized” because it didn’t need a central authority holding dollar reserves. The system used economic incentives to create a self-sustaining environment where traders’ profit-seeking behavior should ensure stability42.
This mechanism created a unique economic relationship: Growing UST demand meant more LUNA would burn. This reduced LUNA’s supply and could increase its value42. LUNA basically absorbed UST’s price volatility and worked as the system’s shock absorber.
Why UST was not backed by real dollars
USDC and USDT keep actual dollar reserves, but UST relied completely on its algorithmic relationship with LUNA and market confidence21. UST had no ground value beyond what the algorithm and market participants gave it.
This lack of ground backing created several critical weaknesses:
The system was fundamentally under-collateralized44. UST’s total circulation value could exceed LUNA’s market cap at any time. Economists call this a “Minsky moment” – when the system doesn’t have enough value to support redemptions45.
The stability mechanism needed continued market confidence and trader participation. Arbitrageurs might stop stabilizing trades if they lost faith in the system or feared more price drops43. This was a fatal flaw – the system needed things it couldn’t control: investor demand, willing arbitrageurs, and reliable price information21.
LUNA’s exponential minting nature created a potential death spiral. During stress periods, UST redemptions for LUNA would dramatically increase LUNA supply. This could cause LUNA tokens to experience hyperinflation and value collapse46. The system could mint endless LUNA – during the collapse, LUNA’s supply grew from 342 million to 6.5 trillion tokens4.
Terra tried to create Bitcoin reserves to support UST, but these reserves proved insufficient compared to UST’s total circulation value. Luna Foundation Guard’s $1.5 billion in reserves couldn’t support $18 billion of UST in circulation when the collapse started45.
Terra’s whitepaper claimed that “the elasticity of LUNA’s supply means that the stablecoins will never fall out of kilter”43. This elasticity became its destruction mechanism. The system’s attempt to absorb volatility through unlimited token issuance created a perfect storm that led to the terra luna crash.
Anchor Protocol and the 20% Yield Trap
Behind Terra’s massive growth stood a key component that became its biggest strength and fatal weakness – Anchor Protocol. This decentralized savings platform built on Terra offered something you rarely see in traditional finance: a massive 19.5% annual percentage yield (APY) on UST deposits11.
How Anchor attracted billions in deposits
Anchor Protocol marketed itself as a decentralized savings product with “low-volatile yields” on Terra stablecoin deposits12. The platform launched in March 2021 and quickly became Terra’s flagship DeFi application. It promised returns that made traditional banking rates look tiny. The concept seemed simple – users put UST into the platform, which others borrowed and paid interest while putting up collateral3.
The incredible 19.5% interest rate caught the attention of yield-seeking investors in the digital world. These extraordinary returns drove Anchor’s quick rise, and deposits grew from zero to over $11 billion in just one year6. The platform had gathered an impressive $14 billion in deposits by early May 2022, right before everything fell apart13.
Anchor’s vital role in Terra’s ecosystem came from its grip on UST circulation. The numbers tell the story – about 72% of all UST in circulation (worth around $13.15 billion) sat in Anchor Protocol14. This made Anchor more than just another DeFi app – it drove the demand for UST.
Anchor worked like an engine that powered Terra’s quick growth. New users who wanted those attractive yields had to buy UST first. This increased demand for the stablecoin and burned LUNA tokens. Both tokens benefited from this setup.
Why the high interest rate was unsustainable
The spectacular growth had serious problems hiding just below the surface that would help bring Terra down. The 19.5% yield wasn’t natural – the team artificially propped it up11.
The protocol tried to fund depositor yields through three main sources: borrower interest payments, staking rewards from collateral, and a “yield reserve” for any gaps3. A big problem emerged when deposits grew much faster than borrowing demand15.
This mismatch became obvious by early 2022. Deposits had reached $6.1 billion, but borrowing stayed at just $1.5 billion15. The platform even paid borrowers about 7% to take loans through its native ANC token – a desperate move to increase borrowing16.
The math painted a grim picture. Anchor made only about $2.2 million daily from staking rewards and borrowing interest. Yet it paid out roughly $6.2 million each day to depositors – creating a $3.95 million daily loss6.
The yield reserve helped maintain the promised returns, but it drained quickly. The reserve held nearly $70 million in December 2021. By February 2022, only $6.56 million remained3. Terraform Labs had to inject $450 million in February 2022 when the reserve almost ran dry3.
Internal calculations showed this wouldn’t last. The reserve dropped by about $4.6 million each day, and estimates showed it would only last 94 days even after the big cash injection6.
Experts raised red flags repeatedly. Research analyst Martin Gaspar pointed out the “inherent imbalance” in the system, noting that “there is far more demand for the 20% yields from depositors than there is demand from borrowers for UST”3. Some users exploited these flaws by borrowing UST at 2.5% interest and depositing it right back to earn 19.5%3.
Looking back, Anchor Protocol shows us what unsustainable yield farming looks like. It created fake growth that made the ecosystem seem healthy while hiding economic problems that helped cause terra luna’s crash.
The First Signs of Trouble
The Terra ecosystem’s seemingly unbreakable foundation started showing its first cracks in early May 2022. A series of coordinated transactions triggered what analysts later identified as a calculated attack on the ecosystem’s stability.
The Curve liquidity pool attack
Terra’s moment of truth came on Saturday, May 7, 2022, through a carefully planned attack on its liquidity foundations. The assault targeted the Curve liquidity pool—a vital component for stablecoins2. Here’s how it unfolded:
Terraform Labs (TFL) pulled $150 million in UST liquidity from the Curve pool at 21:44 GMT. This move reduced the pool’s size substantially while keeping it balanced17. Just 13 minutes later, an account known as “Wallet A” made the pool’s largest swap transaction ever—$85 million UST for USDC17. This massive move threw the pool off balance immediately.
The attack intensified between 22:32-22:38 GMT. Another account (“Wallet B”) swapped $75 million UST in three separate moves17. The Curve pool became severely unstable. TFL then pulled another $100 million in UST liquidity at 22:52 GMT, which left the pool in an even worse state17.
Kevin Zhou from Galois Capital had warned everyone about Terra’s weak points as a “public service”5. Nobody paid attention until it was too late. These well-timed transactions pointed to a coordinated effort rather than random market moves—what analysts later dubbed a “liquidity pool attack”18.
Initial depegging and investor panic
UST’s first real break from its dollar peg happened after the Curve pool manipulation. The price dropped to $0.98 on May 72. This small change sparked major market reactions.
Luna Foundation Guard (LFG) saw the crisis brewing on May 8. They promised $750 million worth of Bitcoin to market makers to protect UST’s peg, plus another $750 million in UST to buy back Bitcoin once things stabilized2. The situation got worse faster.
Anchor Protocol, which held most of UST deposits, saw its value crash from $14 billion to under $9 billion by May 92. This $5 billion exodus showed growing panic among investors. Big depositors led the rush, pulling out almost 15% right away and over 40% within three days17. Small depositors actually put in more money, not seeing the collapse coming17.
UST struggled more as withdrawals picked up speed, falling to $0.914. This triggered the system’s algorithmic mechanism—traders tried to make money by swapping UST for $1 worth of LUNA, which made the system create more LUNA tokens.
The situation turned critical by May 9, with UST crashing to $0.3519. Do Kwon tried to calm everyone with his famous tweet: “Deploying more capital – steady lads”19. The death spiral had started despite these words. LFG tried everything, using up their Bitcoin reserves from 80,000 BTC to just 313 BTC, but nothing worked19.
The project’s downfall started months earlier with unrealistic yields and too much reliance on market confidence. These May events showed how big crypto projects can fall apart when someone finds and exploits their weak spots.
The Death Spiral Begins
The Terra Luna crypto ecosystem faced its first warning signs on May 7-8, 2022. What started as a minor issue turned into a catastrophe that ended up wiping out billions in investor wealth.
Mass withdrawals from Anchor
The exodus from Anchor Protocol gained momentum in early May. Records showed investors pulled out $2.3 billion from $14 billion in UST deposits on May 7 alone20. The situation got worse faster.
The value of deposited assets on Anchor dropped from $14 billion to just $3.7 billion UST between May 7 and May 131. This massive withdrawal of $10.3 billion happened in just one week17. Large depositors led this exodus and moved their funds out first.
The data showed large depositors cut their positions by 15% right away and by 40% within three days of the crisis17. Mid-sized depositors hesitated a bit more but still pulled out about 30% of their holdings during this time17. Small depositors actually added more funds to Anchor17, unaware of the disaster ahead.
These investors weren’t just moving money between crypto investments. They scrambled to cut all ties with UST. An analyst noted: “There has been a mass exodus from Anchor because of UST de-pegging, as UST depositors rush to withdraw and offload their UST tokens”1.
LUNA hyperinflation and price collapse
The flood of withdrawals set off Terra Luna’s “death spiral” mechanism. The protocol started creating LUNA tokens at record speeds as investors rushed to swap their devalued UST back to $1 worth of LUNA through the mint-and-burn system21.
This created a devastating loop: each UST redemption for $1 worth of LUNA made the latter’s supply grow exponentially22. The system minted 25 million new LUNA within days after the crisis started22. This marked the start of a hyperinflationary nightmare.
LUNA’s crash numbers tell a shocking story. The circulating supply exploded from 725 million tokens to 6.9 trillion between May 7 and May 132023. This 1,911,427% supply increase happened in just days20, creating textbook hyperinflation.
The price crashed as the supply grew. LUNA lost 96% of its value on May 122 and fell below 10 cents. The price soon hit zero, erasing billions in market value. Combined with UST’s drop to $0.10, about $40 billion vanished almost overnight24.
The blockchain itself stopped working. The Terra blockchain halted at block height 7603700 on May 122. This emergency stop came after LUNA’s price crash threatened the network’s basic security2.
This collapse stands as crypto’s most dramatic failure. What started as a “loss of peg” turned into what analysts called an “irreversible death spiral”20. The crash destroyed Terra’s tokens and shook trust in algorithmic stablecoins.
The Aftermath of the Terra Collapse
The crypto world faced a financial disaster when Terra’s collapse in May 2022 created havoc. The damage spread well beyond the Terra ecosystem. Terra luna’s crash sent shockwaves through the industry. A single project’s failure turned into a catastrophic event that left lasting scars.
Investor losses and market impact
Terra’s collapse brought staggering financial losses. The combined value of $40-50 billion vanished almost overnight25. The crypto markets lost nearly half a trillion dollars in just one week25. Terra luna’s project alone wiped out about $60 billion26.
People’s lives changed forever. Many investors lost everything they had saved, as several reports of financial devastation showed25. A Chicago factory worker’s story stands out – he lost his entire savings of $40,000 and couldn’t pay his bills9. These stories reveal the real-life damage behind the numbers.
Terra luna’s crash sparked a market-wide disaster that lasted months. Major crypto firms like Celsius and Voyager went bankrupt due to the liquidity crisis19. Rich investors managed to get out early with smaller losses. Poor and less experienced investors stayed longer and lost more money27. The situation got worse when many newcomers tried to “buy the dip” as prices kept falling27.
The crash exposed how deeply connected crypto markets are. Research proved that blockchain networks linked to Terra suffered bigger losses. Each additional shared bridge reduced a network’s chances of growing its TVL (Total Value Locked) share by about 40%28.
Regulatory and legal consequences
Terra’s collapse quickly caught regulators’ attention worldwide. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen pushed to regulate stablecoins by year’s end9. South Korean authorities started an “emergency investigation”9 and later issued arrest warrants for Kwon and other Terra employees in September 20227.
Do Kwon faces serious legal troubles. The SEC charged Terraform Labs and Kwon with fraud in February 2023. They allegedly raised billions from investors through “an interconnected suite of crypto asset securities”19. Authorities arrested Kwon in Montenegro in March 2023 for securities fraud, commodities fraud, and conspiracy25. He pleaded not guilty to U.S. criminal charges in January 2024. If convicted, he could spend up to 130 years in prison19.
Legal battles spread across countries. Singapore saw 369 investors file a lawsuit claiming $57 million in losses7. U.S. law firms started class actions against Kwon and his associates7. Terraform Labs filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2024 to save what remained19.
Terra luna’s crash altered the regulatory map completely. European regulators created MiCA regulations29, clearly influenced by the Terra disaster. The event showed that transparency alone can’t protect investors in complex systems, especially when they process information differently27.
The Launch of Terra 2.0
Do Kwon proposed a bold plan to bring back the Terra ecosystem through a completely new blockchain just days after its catastrophic collapse. Terra 2.0 launched officially on May 28, 2022, after 65.5% of validators backed the revival plan30.
What changed in the new version
Terra 2.0’s most important change removed the algorithmic stablecoin that led to the original system’s downfall completely. The official announcements stated that Terra 2.0 would “effectively create a new Terra chain without the algorithmic stablecoin”8. This complete redesign cut all ties with UST and eliminated the mint-and-burn mechanism that caused the death spiral.
The team renamed the original blockchain “Terra Classic” with its token becoming LUNC. The new chain kept the “Terra” name and LUNA as its token8. Terra 2.0 took a different approach from its predecessor by setting a maximum limit of 1 billion LUNA tokens31.
The new token distribution gave 35% to previous LUNA holders, 10% to pre-collapse UST holders, and 25% to post-crash LUNA/UST holders. Luna investors received the remaining 30%8. Terra’s announcement claimed this restructuring would make Terra “a completely community-owned chain”8.
The new blockchain managed to keep the Proof of Stake consensus mechanism32. DeFi applications needed fresh deployment since existing smart contracts didn’t move to the new chain10.
Community response and skepticism
LUNA 2.0 started trading at $17.80 and briefly touched $19.53 in its first hour30. The excitement didn’t last long. The token dropped to $4.39 within hours8, showing a 55% fall in just 72 hours after launch33.
Several major exchanges like Huobi, Bitfinex, Bitrue, and later Binance supported the new token34. The community remained split on this decision. Users felt confused about who would receive the airdrop34, while industry experts showed strong doubts about Terra 2.0’s future.
Mati Greenspan, Quantum Economics’ founder, gave a harsh verdict: “Luna 2 was never meant to survive, it was simply a mechanism for some who were heavily invested to recoup some of their losses”35. Messari analyst Kunal Goel pointed out that “Terra 2.0 suffers from multiple problems” including “no clear point of differentiation from other smart contract platforms”35.
The recovery efforts struggled against what one analyst called “the baggage of being tied to the largest ever crypto collapse”35.
Lessons Every Investor Should Learn
The Terra Luna crypto ecosystem’s dramatic collapse teaches great lessons to anyone in the cryptocurrency world. Top-tier projects with billions in market capitalization can fail catastrophically when their design has fundamental flaws.
Red flags to watch for in crypto projects
Terra Luna’s crash revealed several warning signals that investors must not ignore. Projects that promise unrealistic yields—like Anchor’s 19.5% APY—should raise red flags immediately. Returns that seem too good to be true usually are. These signs point to misleading or unsafe projects that could have fatal design problems.
The tokenomics deserve a close look too. Terra’s collapse showed how systems with complex, unclear investment structures can hide serious weaknesses. Most legitimate crypto projects have transparent teams that stand proudly behind their work. Anonymous developers usually signal regulatory avoidance or outright scams.
Excessive hype and urgency in marketing should set off alarm bells. Many crypto scams make use of FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) to rush investors into decisions without proper research. This manipulation tactic helped Terra Luna attract billions before its eventual crash.
Why due diligence matters more than hype
Smart research remains your best defense against cryptocurrency disasters. Studies show that wealthy and sophisticated investors who understood the system’s weak points got out early and lost less during Terra’s collapse. Less informed investors stayed longer and tried to “buy the dip,” which made their losses worse.
A thorough investigation must cover:
- The team’s track record and experience
- Project’s utility and ground applications
- Technical infrastructure and security measures
- Token distribution and economic model
- Regulatory compliance efforts
Terra’s downfall proves that blockchain’s transparency alone can’t protect investors when they process and interpret information differently. A solid risk management system needs allocation limits, diversification strategies, and stop-loss parameters. These safeguards help prevent devastating losses during extreme market events.
Conclusion
The Terra Luna crash shows how size and popularity don’t guarantee safety in crypto markets. The project built up billions in value and got major institutional backing. Yet its basic flaws led to one of crypto’s biggest wealth wipes.
This turning point taught us some vital lessons. Any promise of sky-high yields, like Anchor’s 19.5% APY, should set off alarm bells. Nobody should jump into complex tokenomics and algorithmic systems without understanding them first. The market’s buzz or social media hype won’t help if you haven’t done your homework.
The effects still ripple through crypto markets. New regulations, Do Kwon’s legal troubles, and people’s distrust of algorithmic stablecoins all stem from Terra’s downfall. Terra 2.0’s poor performance proves that once trust breaks in crypto, it rarely comes back.
Smart investors know crypto opportunities pack serious risks. Your best shield against such disasters? Do your research, spread your investments wisely, and stay skeptical of promises that sound too good to be true. These basic rules matter even more as crypto keeps changing.
FAQs
Q1. What were the main factors that led to the Terra Luna crash? The Terra Luna crash was primarily caused by the interdependence of LUNA and UST tokens in the Terra ecosystem. When UST lost its dollar peg, it triggered a death spiral where massive UST redemptions led to LUNA hyperinflation. This was exacerbated by an initial attack on Curve liquidity pools and mass withdrawals from the Anchor protocol.
Q2. Is there any chance of Luna recovering to its previous value? It’s highly unlikely that Luna (now LUNC) will recover to its previous high values. While some analysts project potential modest gains, these are speculative and depend on factors like continued community support and burn programs. The original Luna project suffered catastrophic and irreversible damage to its reputation and economic model.
Q3. What are some red flags investors should watch for in crypto projects? Key red flags include promises of unsustainably high yields, complex and opaque tokenomics, anonymous development teams, excessive marketing hype, and a lack of clear real-world utility. The Terra Luna case demonstrated how even popular projects can hide fundamental flaws behind impressive growth numbers.
Q4. How much value was lost in the Terra Luna collapse? The Terra Luna crash wiped out an estimated $40-50 billion in combined value almost overnight. This includes around $60 billion in value from the Terra Luna project itself, with additional losses across the broader crypto market totaling nearly half a trillion dollars in the week following the collapse.
Q5. What lessons can investors learn from the Terra Luna crash? The Terra Luna crash emphasizes the importance of thorough due diligence over market hype. Investors should carefully research a project’s fundamentals, including its team, technology, and economic model. Diversification and setting clear risk management parameters are crucial to protect against catastrophic losses in volatile crypto markets.
References
[1] – https://www.theblock.co/post/146318/anchor-token-plunges-70-amid-worsening-ust-and-luna-crisis
[2] – https://www.coindesk.com/learn/the-fall-of-terra-a-timeline-of-the-meteoric-rise-and-crash-of-ust-and-luna
[3] – https://www.businessinsider.com/anchor-protocol-terra-blockchain-ust-stablecoin-deposit-high-yield-crypto-2022-3
[4] – https://blockapps.net/blog/what-caused-the-depeg-of-terrausd-an-in-depth-analysis-of-its-collapse/
[5] – https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-15/luna-crash-this-crypto-insider-warned-of-terra-ust-s-collapse
[6] – https://medium.com/coinmonks/20-yield-lunacy-or-brilliance-part-1-deep-dive-into-anchor-protocols-business-model-12b5450efd66
[7] – https://blockworks.co/news/5-legal-threats-do-kwon-faces-since-terras-collapse
[8] – https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/05/26/terra-luna-2-0-how-backers-of-the-project-want-to-revive-the-failed-cryptocurrency
[9] – https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2022/5/20/after-terra-crash-investors-and-regulators-count-cost-of-crypto
[10] – https://junhoyeo.github.io/terra-docs/docs/migration/migrating-to-terra2.html
[11] – https://blockapps.net/blog/the-timeline-of-usts-collapse-understanding-the-failures-and-implications-of-algorithmic-stablecoins/
[12] – https://docs.anchorprotocol.com/
[13] – https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-real-force-behind-usts-collapse%3A-unsustainable-anchor-yields
[14] – https://capital.com/anchor-protocol-anc-price-prediction
[15] – https://cointelegraph.com/news/anchor-protocol-s-reserves-head-toward-depletion-due-to-lack-of-borrowing-demand
[16] – https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/heres-why-im-passing-on-anchors-20-apy
[17] – https://jumpcrypto.com/writing/the-depegging-of-ust/
[18] – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1544612322005359
[19] – https://www.securities.io/new-evidence-surfaces-was-terras-downfall-engineered/
[20] – https://repool.com/the-deep-end/terra-luna/
[21] – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terra_(blockchain)
[22] – https://blockworks.co/news/cryptocurrency-luna-lurches-as-terra-usd-volatility-continues-erasing-billions
[23] – https://stevengong.co/notes/LUNA-Coin
[24] – https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/the-collapse-of-ust-and-luna-was-devastating-but-there-is-still-hope-for-crypto
[25] – https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/cryptocurrency/what-happened-to-terra/
[26] – https://www.vaneck.com/fi/en/blog/digital-assets/terra–a-year-in-review-since-its-collapse/
[27] – https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2023/05/22/anatomy-of-a-run-the-terra-luna-crash/
[28] – https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/files/2023044pap.pdf
[29] – https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/regulation/25y-after-terra-and-luna-collapse-sec-reaches-123-million-settlement-with-crypto-firm/
[30] – https://capital.com/en-au/analysis/terra-luna-2-0
[31] – https://www.btcc.com/en-US/academy/crypto-basics/terra-luna-2-0-vs-luna-classic-lunc-what-are-the-differences
[32] – https://coindcx.com/blog/cryptocurrency/terra-luna-vs-luna-classic/
[33] – https://www.fxempire.com/news/article/within-72-hours-since-its-launch-terra-luna-2-0-crashes-by-55-1018055
[34] – https://ambcrypto.com/terra-2-0-proposal-gets-the-crypto-communitys-nod-of-approval-but-thats-not-all/
[35] – https://www.livemint.com/market/cryptocurrency/luna-2-0-is-dubious-over-its-potential-analysts-react-to-the-new-token-11654879935815.html
[36] – https://docs.terra.money/learn/protocol
[37] – https://www.coindesk.com/learn/what-is-luna-and-ust-a-guide-to-the-terra-ecosystem
[38] – https://sarsonfunds.com/introduction-to-the-terra-ecosystem-ust-and-luna/
[39] – https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/what-is-terra-a-guide-to-terra-s-ecosystem
[40] – https://medium.com/coinmonks/the-rise-and-fall-of-terra-luna-a554c8056f9a
[41] – https://www.smartsight.in/technology/what-is-terra-blockchain/
[42] – https://classic-docs.terra.money/docs/learn/protocol.html
[43] – https://decrypt.co/resources/what-is-terra-algorithmic-stablecoin-protocol-explained
[44] – https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/algorithmic-stablecoins-and-devaluation-risk
[45] – https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_brief/2022/eb_22-24
[46] – https://cointelegraph.com/learn/articles/algorithmic-vs-collateralized-stablecoins
More on Piphackers